ROCCA LAWSUIT
đ¨NEW MARYLAND ELECTION LAWSUIT - August 22, 2024
âłď¸ Case number 1:24-cv-02442-ADC
US District Court for the District of Maryland
IN MY VIEW....
THIS IS A NOBLE ATTEMPT TO ADDRESS A MAJOR DEFECT IN THE ELECTION PROCESS....but sadly, destined to fail.
I don't necessarily disagree with plaintiff's claims, "feelings" or those opinions expressed about those out-of-state instances that point to mishandling of ballots and a breakdown of the system that require trust and reliable results......
I THINK WE ALL "FEEL" THAT WAY GIVEN WHAT WE'VE LEARNED.....
IMO studied opinion, his focus should have stayed on the failures and breakdowns of Maryland elections and not wandered afield beyond our own state's borders as some have in recent memory that also derailed those lawsuits. đ¤
âłď¸(There are plenty of examples and unimpeachable evidence published by Maryland 20-20 Watch to support a claim that MAIL-IN ballots have been a complete failure in Maryland, right along with the hopeless use of the MotorVoter program).
But I also see this lawsuit as preemptory/arbitrary; "not supported by fair, solid, and substantial cause" and because of that, the claim has not "ripened" and therefore as I've stated: destined to fail.....
(In plain english, it has not happened to him yet).
Further.... where Plaintiff states:
"Plaintiff Brian R. Della Rocca is a U.S. citizen with an interest in protecting his rights as a voter in the United States of America. Plaintiff is a licensed attorney in the State of Maryland and is working to ensure that he and his fellow citizens can effectively exercise their right to vote for their chosen presidential nominee. Plaintiff is registered as an independent voter and has no affiliation with any political party.
âŚď¸ Some important admissions that harm his case, as stated in plaintiff's brief -
đđž Plaintiff has requested a mail-in ballot for the 2024 election.
đđ˝As a mail-in voter, Plaintiff is directly harmed by the failures by the USPS and is specifically harmed by the loss of ballots being transported through the mail system and the ease in which fraud can be perpetrated through mail-in voting."
â I VIEW THE ABOVE
AS BOTH HIS ACCEPTANCE of risk because he chose to use a system he admittedly does not trust and therefore has negated any claim he might have....
AND secondly, he's failed to establish how (he) "is directly harmed".
âŚď¸We will continue to follow this case through the system and report to you whatever happens. #NewtonSaidIt
WILLIAM NEWTON
Research Investigator
{logged August 23, 2024 at 2:30 PM}
DOWNLOAD FULL CASE FILING AT -
Commenti